EL 42 binoculars combine size, weight, and optical performance to give the perfect product. If this is something that would drive you crazy, then you will likely be more comfortable with the SLCs. Join The O&A Mailer! more Format Format . EL Model Ergonomics – The EL’s have a long, narrow, open-bridge design. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. I went with the 10 power for slightly better distance viewing and ID of raptors. The Swarovski 42-mm EL Swarovision is the kind of binocular that raises the bar for everybody and in one step, changes the top end of the optics market. The housing was changed but also new antireflection coatings were added. Please provide a valid price range. and 28.1 oz. However, the truth is that both of these binocular models are excellent and you likely won’t regret purchasing either of them. After reading as much info as I could get my hands on, it seemed like there were so many opinions out there that I needed to do a comparative analysis myself to decide. And the clarity and brightness all the way to the edge of the field is exceptional. In fact, Company/product listings on this page DO NOT imply endorsement by the site operator. Include description. Product & Technical Services, Tips & Care, Tutorials, Downloads My service. But the increased magnification is very nice. In 2011 we tested the Swarovski SLC 10x42 WB HD which, almost three years ago, was superseded by the Swarovski SLC 10x42 W B. I have had several Swaro binoculars and all were great. The ability to focus down to 5 feet allows study of the smallest details of the birds coming to our feeders. The latest SLC models, such as the 10x42mm version sent for testing, are almost a completely different binocular. Today the best of the best, the Titans of binocular quality, are the new Leica Noctivid, the updated Swarovski EL Swarovision with Field Package, and the updated Zeiss Victory SF T*.. In addition to the high-end optics, you are also getting the lifetime, no questions asked, full warranty on these binoculars. Swarovski EL 10x32 vs 10x42? This one is very much up to your own personal preference and some people prefer the fit and feel of one pair over the other. Advertiser Disclosure. The scoring that appears on this site is determined by the site operator in its sole discretion, and should NOT be relied upon for accuracy purposes. If you purchase a product through a link on our site, we may get a commission. Unfortunately, this feature does come with one big negative, the dreaded rollerball effect. One more step! It's also the kind of binocular that makes this job really fun to do! What’s interesting the minimum focusing distance became noticeably bigger. We’ve broken down this section by feature to compare and contrast the differences for you. This is a bit more niche though, and not as practical as a 10x or 12x configuration would be. Swarovski Optik SLC 10x42 Waterproof Binoculars with FieldPro Package, Green, Field bag pro, Eyepiece cover, Objective lens cover, Lift carrying strap pro, Field bag, Eyepiece cover, Objective lens cover, Lift carrying strap, New EL with Swarovision Technology, Field Flattener Lenses, Long Eye Relief, HD lenses minimize color fringing, Improved viewing comfort, SWAROBRIGHT trademark technologie, SWAROCLEAN trademark technologie, HD Optical System, SWAROBRIGHT trademark technologie, SWAROCLEAN trademark technologie, Nikon Monarch HG (16028) 10X42 Binocular, Black, Vortex Optics Fury HD 10x42 Laser Rangefinding Binocular, Leica Geovid HD-B 10x42 Laser Range Finding Binocular, Celestron Cavalry (71426) 15x70 Binocular (Olive Green), Celestron SkyMaster 15x70 Giant Binoculars with Tripod Adapter, Nikon Prostaff 7 (7538) 10x42 Binocular (Black), Nikon Monarch 7 10x42 ED ATB Waterproof/Fogproof Binoculars with Case, Leica Trinovid HD 10 X 42 Binocular with Adventure Strap, Vortex Optics Razor HD Roof Prism Binoculars, Nikon Prostaff 5 (7571) 10X42 Binocular (Black) by Nikon, Nikon Prostaff 3S 10x42 Binocular for Hunting and Birdwatching, Black, Nikon Prostaff 7s Binocular 42mm Roof Prism Armored, Vortex Optics Diamondback Classic Binoculars, Best Vertical Climbers to Tone Your Muscles, Swarovski Optik EL vs Swarovski Optik SLC. The best binoculars I've owned or seen so far. Unfortunately, this feature does come with one big negative, the dreaded rollerball effect. This feature is what allows for those beautiful, crisp edges, flawless images, and flat field of view that looks so nice. This costs you nothing, and it helps to pay our writers and for the site’s upkeep. Some configurations are only available in certain models. Some people love it and some people hate it. My eyesight is very different in each eye and these have the best, largest and most positive diopter adjustment I have ever used. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. My standard "test binocular" for comparison to anything in the 10x40 class is a Swarovski 10x42 EL from the maker's higher-priced line. Some people even prefer the more natural look of the SLC model. The ELs also come in the much coveted 12×50 configuration, which the SLCs do not. This one’s a bit of a toss up, but our Editor’s Pick is the Swarovski EL. How we think; How we act; Our company; FAQ; Order Process; Returns and repairs; Shipping options; Contact; My service. Excellent glass and rugged built. for the 8x42 and 10x42 models respectively.The tethered objective lens covers and rain guard add another 2.3 oz. Swarovski makes amazing binoculars, there’s no doubt about that. I find, though, that the greater magnification and detail make possible more rapid identification of birds that I see fleetingly. Plus, the SLCs are honestly just fantastic binoculars. Swarovski wasn't content to stay put, however, so in October 2015, they introduced an ergonomic upgrade called the EL Swarovision Pro. One with nature: Patrick roaming the woods with the NL Pure Reading time: 2 min. I got the 10x magnification and have no trouble holding them steady. Zeiss Conquest HD vs Swarovski SLC 10×42 – comparison based on cost and value. Light weight, comfortable ergonomics ,and rubber coating keeps my hands warmer in cold weather than competing rubber coating bino's. Product Comparison: Zeiss Victory SF vs Swarovski Optik EL. While the EL models have sharper images thanks to Swavorski-Vision, the SLCs actually have slightly better light transmission. In this article, we’ll be talking about the differences between the SLC and the EL models to help you decide! Another nice feature. They are multipurpose and reliable, suitable for use both during the day and at twilight. Perfect clarity, true colors, very bright and so on. The field of view is a bit narrower, so it is a little more difficult to get on the bird, particularly when it is nearby. The SLC model will still perform very well in the field. In general, the “SLC” – slim, light, compact is totally true. Adres wydawcy oraz redakcji: ul. I find, though, that the greater magnification and detail make possible more rapid identification of birds that I see fleetingly. Swarovski SLC HD Features vs Non-HD SLC Models. Whilst not class leading and falls a little short of the 10x42 EL, for a 10x magnification, it is still pretty good. So.. is it worth it? I just think these Bin's are great. Both the beauties in our list are the best in class, so the price tag understandably falls in the upper strata of the market. It is illegal to copy or redistribute any information found on this site in any way without the expressed written consent of CO-NET Robert Olech Wydawcą allbinos.com jest firma CO-NET Robert Olech. Refine. Related: swarovski slc 10x42 hd swarovski el 10x42 swarovski slc 8x42 swarovski binoculars zeiss conquest hd binoculars 10x42 swarovski slc 15x56 leica 10x42. So, if you prefer a certain configuration, then the choice may be made for you. Sep 27, 2009 #1 I've looked trought both binoculars in the store and both look amazing. Tried the 10x42 SLC-HD, and it is my 2nd favorite (spelled correctly ) roof prism, too. Is it worth spending the extra money for the Swarovski SLC binoculars over the Vortex Razors HD’s? I’ve wondered this myself. Our standards are high, and we seek the best. For reference, my sole purpose for these binoculars is hunting out w… All stories. Category . $830 is a lot of cash to pony up for the upgrade to the EL’s. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. Real multipurpose binoculars. X. These have the traditional binocular view, with a slight curvature, which you should be used to if you’ve ever used any other binoculars. Compare Swarovski EL 12x50 SwaroVision Binocular vs Swarovski El Range 10x42 Binocular vs Swarovski EL 10x50 SwaroVision Binocular vs Vortex 12x50 Razor HD Binoculars They also have the ruberied body versus the hard plastic. Thread starter Murf45; Start date Sep 27, 2009; M. Murf45 Active Member. They are a little heavier, but not noticeable especially if you used them with a harness. Swarovski SLC binoculars are more expensive compared to Zeiss Conquest binoculars. Better optics, better focusing mechanism and less weight to name a few. You can read additional consumer reviews and check prices at Amazon, or keep reading to see why you might not want the ELs. You will enjoy these rugged, ergonomic binoculars for many years. We weighed them in at 29.3 oz. Given as a gift & loved by the recipient. In conclusion, there are some big differences here, and you’ll need to take your personal preferences into account before making a purchase. You'll Get Our Best Content, and Awesome Deals On Gear From Our Partners. EL 42 THE IMPRESSIVE, MULTIPURPOSE BINOCULARS EL 42 binoculars combine size, weight, and optical performance to give the perfect product. These binoculars are optically the best I have owned. I have always preferred the SLC 10x42's over the EL's in the same power range as i found that extra weight helped me stabilise the binoculars, less shake or movement equals more movement from animals picked up, especially at longer ranges. Though if you need long-range scanning, the SLC 15×56 mounted on a tripod might be the way to go for you. A bit heavier that other comparable models but I use a full harness rather than neck strap so it is not impactful for me in the field. These babies have amazing clarity, crisp edges, and they look absolutely beautiful in the field. Swarovski EL’s run $2629, and the SLC’s $1799. For example, the EL comes in 12×50, while the SLC model does not. Shop by category ... Related: swarovski el 10x42 range swarovski slc 10x42 swarovski el 10 x 32 swarovski el 8.5x42 swarovski binoculars swarovski el 10x50 swarovski el 10x42 orange. Let's get down to the nitty gritty details that count. I picked up a pair of both binoculars in the 10×42’s and started testing. Product Comparison: Swarovski Optik EL vs Swarovski Optik SLC. Let’s start with the biggest one, which is likely to be what makes or breaks your decision to purchase the EL or the SLC…. Many hunters even own both models for different purposes! The balance is also excellent. In this video, Trail goes over the differences, price point, and use cases of the Swaro EL and SLC 10x42 Binocular. The only way to really tell here is to buy a pair from a retailer with a good “no questions asked” return policy like Amazon and try them out. Price. Swarovski SLC binoculars are roof prism binoculars of a single-hinge design. New (2) Items (2) Used (2) Items (2) see all. Join Our Weekly Mailer to Save 15-50% on Premium Hunting & Fishing Gear. Please be advised that the operator of this site accepts advertising compensation from certain companies that appear on the site, and such compensation impacts the location and order in which the companies (and/or their products) are presented, and in some cases may also impact the scoring that is assigned to them. Swarovski SLC 10x42 Waterproof Binoculars with FieldPro Package, Green. In fact, many people barely even notice it. One of the biggest differences between the EL model and the SLC model is the inclusion of “Swarovision“. Selected category All. Modern optic companies, led by Swarovski and a few others have approached perfection so closely that the differences are nearly undetectable to the human eye. It is a bit heavier but smaller than Vortex Diamondback 10×42. Advertiser Disclosure . We’d still go with the EL model, but if you can’t stomach the “rollerball”, or if you prefer a more “natural” look to your binoculars, then the SLC won’t do you wrong. The SLC pairs of binoculars of 42 mm class feature Schmidt- Pechan roof prisms and 4-element objective … Shop with confidence. I am not disappointed. More info, Copyright © 2020 www.bestadvisor.com. So, if you can’t stomach the rollerball effect of the ELs, there’s nothing to be sad about. Binoculars & Telescopes; Sporting Goods. That being said, they do have their problems (depending on who you ask that is.). SLC Model Ergonomics – The SLCs have a more traditional styling with an “H” style body which some people prefer. While they are not quite as crisp as the EL model and you’ll have to deal with the blurred edges, the rollerball effect is not present. Let’s start with a quick features/spec comparison chart. as good as the Swarovski 10x42 SLC's? The clarity is absolutely the finest I've seen to date. This feature is what allows for those beautiful, crisp edges, flawless images, and flat field of view that looks so nice. Except as expressly set forth in our Terms of Use, all representations and warranties regarding the information presented on this page are disclaimed. However, the SLC model comes in a 15×56 configuration, and the EL does not. This quest has led to a healthy debate about a couple of the best binoculars on the market. The rollerball effect is an “optical bubble” that appears when panning, especially through areas of trees. The field of view is wide and without distortion at the edge. However, some people are sensitive to it and it drives them nuts. What exactly is new with these next generation Swarovski SLC binoculars for bird watching? The best of the best . However, if you’re looking for the best optics, look no further. Cameras & Photo. I currently use the 10x42 EL Range and it is the best of the lot. They are multipurpose and reliable, suitable for use both during the day and at twilight. Hunting; Condition. This Swarovski 10x42 SLC has a viewing angle of 6.3° which when measured out to a distance, produces a view that is 110 meters wide at a distance of 1000 meters or 330ft @ 1000 yards. Now, for most people, they don’t seem to mind this ‘effect’ at all. Here the Zeiss Conquest wins by quite a wide margin. Swarovski is like Rolls Royce of the binocular industry and rightly so. Every hunter has their preferred configuration, but if you’re not very experienced with binoculars, most hunters seem to prefer the 10x or 12x configurations. Though this is only by a 3% margin, nothing to write home about. 15x56 Swarovski SLC vs. 12x50 Swarovski EL For those of us who are muley crazy, there seems to be a never-ending desire to gain an edge over the mythical giants we chase. In comparison, Swarovski SLC is comparatively lighter at 765 grams or 27 oz. They are about 6.25 inches long with the eyecups fully extended and almost exactly 5 inches across with the hinge at its widest setting. In contrast, the Swarovski SLC has a field of view of 110 meters at 1000 meters (330 ft at 1000 yards) and a viewing angle of 6.3°. - Teddy Roosevelt, The ELs also come in the much coveted 12×50 configuration, read additional consumer reviews and check prices at Amazon, This feature is what allows for those beautiful, crisp edges, flawless images, and flat field of view that looks so nice, Swarovision offers better colors and sharper images, you will likely be more comfortable with the SLCs, the EL comes in 12×50, while the SLC model does not, the SLC model comes in a 15×56 configuration, most hunters seem to prefer the 10x or 12x configurations, the SLC 15×56 mounted on a tripod might be the way to go for you, buy a pair from a retailer with a good “no questions asked” return policy like Amazon, you should opt for an SLC model with a large aperture. If this interests you though, you should opt for an SLC model with a large aperture, such as the 8×56 or 10×56 configurations, which are not available in the EL series. Outdoorsandammunition.com is a particpant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program and other affiliate networks. The Swarovski 10x42 SLC's are an excellent binocular and are the ones that most folks compare against..... Is the Meopta MeoStar 10x42, Leica Trinovid 10x42, Kowa Genesis 10.5x44, Zeiss Conquest HD 10x42, etc. ­ All Rights Reserved. Only drawback is the price, but worth it if you want this level of quality. X. Nature lovers appreciate the unique close-up setting of 3.3 m and the rapid, precise focusing mechanism. The SLC 8x42 and the SLC 10x42 binoculars are sturdy in any weather, day in day out, and also stand out thanks to their particularly high optical quality. Go your email inbox and confirm your subscription to start getting the goodies. Very easy to adjust focus and quickly. Joined Sep 22, 2009 Messages 32. It seems to be a constant search for the lightest, clearest, and most durable. This site is not responsible for any damage that the information on this site may cause to your system. Zeiss Conquest 10×42 HD weights 795 grams or 28 oz. Weight and Size. These affiliate advertising programs are designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by linking to Amazon or other affiliate partners. In this review we look at the 10x42 versions of these three … But, how do you choose which model? SWAROVSKI OPTIK CAMPEX Le Casellacce Reading time: 3 min. Nature lovers appreciate the unique close-up setting of 1.5 m and the rapid, precise focusing mechanism. The new Swarovski SLC HD binoculars are available in both 8x42 and 10x42 magnifications. When the binoculars are stationary, you won’t see it at all, but if you were, for example, following a deer through the woods, it could get annoying depending on the person. I can't really see any difference between the 32 and 42. The slightly reduced field of view and the slightly increased need for a steadier hand are not that noticeable to me. "The farther one gets into the wilderness, the greater is the attraction of its lonely freedom." One of the biggest differences between the EL model and the SLC model is the inclusion of “ Swarovision “. Good optics but they should be for how much money you have to shell out. x` Even though this is likely a “money no object” comparison, it matters. There's a good reason why this is the one all others are compared to. The Swarovski SLC 10×42 W B is lighter and smaller than the same model of Swarovski EL, Leica Noctivid HD, Zeiss Conquest HD. Skip to main content. These fit the bill for an "all purpose" binocular. The information which appears on this site is subject to change at any time. Besides the outstanding transparency and good glare control, it's virtually CA free in the centerfield and sharp almost to the edge, no need for transmission robbing field flatteners. I can't see an ounce of difference optically between SLC and EL. The last pair of binos they'll need for the rest of their life-quoted. Find great deals on eBay for swarovski el 10x42 and swarovski el 10x42 range. Prior to the Swaro's I had B&L, Zeiss and later Leitz/Leica.